Difference between revisions of "IBM 1050"

From Terminals
Jump to: navigation, search
m (stub)
m (update citation)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
| baud_rates = 75, 150
 
| baud_rates = 75, 150
 
}}
 
}}
The IBM 1050 Data Communications System was introduced on March 12th 1963.<ref>Emerson, Pugh, Johnson, Palmer 1991 p. 782</ref>
+
The IBM 1050 Data Communications System was introduced on March 12th 1963.<ref>{{cite journal
 +
| last1 = Pugh
 +
| first1 = Emerson W.
 +
| last2 = Johnson
 +
| first2 = Lyle R.
 +
| last3 = Palmer
 +
| first3 = John H.
 +
| date = December 2011
 +
| title = IBM's 360 and Early 370 Systems
 +
| journal = The Business History Review
 +
| volume = 65
 +
| issue = 04
 +
| pages = 782
 +
| publisher = MIT Press
 +
| location = Cambridge, Mass.
 +
<!-- | doi = 10.2307/3117279 not supported by this template yet -->
 +
}}</ref>
  
 
A typical 1050 system consisted of a 1051 control unit (big black box underneath the desk in the picture), and a 1052 keyboard/printer. This could be expanded with paper tape reader(1054) and punch(1055) or a card reader/punch(1442).
 
A typical 1050 system consisted of a 1051 control unit (big black box underneath the desk in the picture), and a 1052 keyboard/printer. This could be expanded with paper tape reader(1054) and punch(1055) or a card reader/punch(1442).

Revision as of 16:03, 26 February 2026

IBM 1050
Ibm1050.gif
Manufacturer IBM
Model 1050
Lifetime
Introduced March, 1963
Communication
Baud Rates 75, 150

The IBM 1050 Data Communications System was introduced on March 12th 1963.[1]

A typical 1050 system consisted of a 1051 control unit (big black box underneath the desk in the picture), and a 1052 keyboard/printer. This could be expanded with paper tape reader(1054) and punch(1055) or a card reader/punch(1442).

On many IBM System 360 mainframes, a bare 1052 keyboard/printer was hard-wired into the system for use as the console terminal.

References

  1. Pugh, Emerson W.; Johnson, Lyle R.; Palmer, John H. (December 2011). "IBM's 360 and Early 370 Systems". The Business History Review (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press) 65 (04): 782.